PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-020924_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605_YT_2d24ba15 licensed under gpl3-or-later
Views : 2,929,485
Genre: Science & Technology
License: Standard YouTube License
Uploaded At Apr 22, 2025 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.97 (1,549/201,916 LTDR)
99.24% of the users lieked the video!!
0.76% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 98.86- Masterpiece Video
RYD date created : 2025-05-04T13:34:13.478322Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
You forget why you're there after wandering into the kitchen because your Working Memory has dumped its buffer of old items to add new items. This typically happens when you aren't staying focussed on your task, so the brain will judge that any memories related to your previous task has a lower priority to new information: such as whatever you just looked at when entering the kitchen & the cascade of memories that seeing it has pulled out of your medium/long-term memory.
3 | 0
Just a heads-up: That coffee we gave you earlier had fluorescent calcium in it so we can track the neuronal activity in your brain. There's a slight chance the calcium could harden and vitrify your frontal lobe. Anyway, don't stress yourself thinking about it. I'm serious. Visualizing the scenario while under stress actually triggers the reaction. -- cave johnson 1957
4.6K | 31
I have this feeling that our brains have another level of neurological communication outside chemical, electrical or physical interactions. This feeling is born from the knowledge that a subject can slip on a cap wired with sensors which detect signals from the brain as it operates. Whatās to say that neurons are not able to pick up signals much like the sensor cap? Can a neuron detect a signal like the sensor cap from a neuron on the other side of the brain? Letās call that a bit. How many links can be made from one neuron to all the others in this way? If they all do this the computational complexity would be off the charts. However as highly unlikely as this may be I still feel like there might be something to this ideaā¦
7 | 0
Very Oversimplified:
The "walking into the kitchen and forgetting what you were doing" is called the doorway effect and its a glitch that happens due to the way our brains are set up.
Our short term memory is designed to throw out information when it no longer becomes relevant. So, for example, you're not still thinking about the pretty butterfly you saw outside your breakfast at mealtime when you arrive at school or at work. You're in a new place with new expectations. Its what allows us to change our focus to new things.
Our brains do this by dumping all non essential information when we move onto something "new". And because doorways are the dividing paths between rooms you are moving from an old room to a new one. So sometimes your brain dumps part of your short term memory because it was information you picked up in the old room. And now you're in the new room. This is also why turning around and quickly returning to the first room can bring the memory back sometimes. Because your brain isn't done getting rid of it and can recall and rebuild the memory.
Edit: As some have pointed out yes, this is still a theory. But it's the best educated guess we have at this moment because we don't fully understand it but we know we're in the right ballpark. It's the same way that gravity is a theory. We don't fully understand it yet, but parts we know are true in certain situations.
Edit2: And because people in the comments are being extremely pedantic with how I phrased my words, yes, I understand the difference between "substantiated theory" and "educated guess" and am taking linguistic liberties so that I can be more clear for the less scientifically inclined everyman as opposed to trying to be as accurate as possible (as the human brain and memory is extremely complex) in an explanation that is intended to be very simplified.
1.3K | 58
As a materials engineer working almost every day with an SEM (Scanning Electron Microscope), I believe there are far more effective ways to scan a mouseās brain than slicing it into 25,000 sections and scanning each one. You could achieve similar results in a fraction of the time probably around 1% of the time it took them using a Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM).
Additionally, there are other approaches. For instance, a powerful enough CT scan (Computed Tomography) could map the entire brain, and with AI-assisted reconstruction, you could generate a full 3D volume.
Finally, if slicing is still the preferred method for that level of detail, an AFM (Atomic Force Microscope) would likely be a better choice.
In conclusion, I think it ultimately comes down to funding. Equipment like this is typically reserved for high-tech industrial applications, while fundamental research projects like mapping a mouseās brain are, unfortunately, often underfunded.
125 | 10
@DrBenMiles
1 week ago
What are we going to do tonight, Brain?
Same thing we do every night, Pinky.
4.2K | 50