PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-020924_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605_YT_2d24ba15 licensed under gpl3-or-later
ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #ad9498 (color 2)
Video Format : (720p) openh264 ( https://github.com/cisco/openh264) mp4a.40.2 | 44100Hz
Audio Format: 140 ( High )
PokeEncryptID: 2f605442a21e0394edbb3a35757a2621f1a4dc4f03539258cca7c865c73964ec555b06a0eea52731b32302df1e10d701
Proxy : woke-proxy.poketube.fun - refresh the page to change the proxy location
Date : 1746457900043 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text : TnRKcGZOWGtkdFUgaSAgbG92ICB1IHdva2UtcHJveHkucG9rZXR1YmUuZnVu
143 : true
105,972 Views • Apr 21, 2025 • Click to toggle off description
Views : 105,972
Genre: Science & Technology
License: Standard YouTube License
Uploaded At Apr 21, 2025 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.929 (70/3,901 LTDR)
98.24% of the users lieked the video!!
1.76% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 97.36- Overwhelmingly Positive
RYD date created : 2025-05-05T02:09:14.123183Z
See in json
243 Comments
Top Comments of this video!! :3
The Saturn V was designed to be built in a world where gas was 10c/gal, Engineers were paid $4/hr, cars cost $2,600 but the Apollo Guidance Computer cost $200,000 (in 1960s dollars) but had 1000x less capability than a $5 calculator has today. We are in a completely different world where hardware is cheap but labor is expensive - complete opposite from the 1960s.
75 | 5
Why make an outdated rocket when you can make a better one anyway right?
115 | 17
I love how this guy defends the moon missions . Respect .
5 | 0
The plans weren't lost, it was the industrial knowledge pool that was lost.
14 | 3
Also, if someone will want to build it again it will be something like the F-1B engine. An in-depth examination of the parts that still exist today to learn the changes between the drawings and production and the knowledge of the craft of those who produced it all, and then creating a modern version of it.
14 | 2
You can absolutely perform every manufacturing step required to manufacture an F1 engine using modern manufacturing and fabrication processes. In fact, you could almost certainly make a lighter, more powerful, more efficient F1 engine with today's material science and manufacturing.
The problem is that those engines are so incredibly labor intensive and quite frankly primitive in design that you'd be better off adapting the bottom of a Saturn V to take 40 merlin engines, or strapping stages 2 and up to the top of a super heavy booster. Better performance, lower material and labor cost, and you don't have to retest to make sure the engines are built correctly; we already know the production line works.
Quite simply, the F1 engine and Saturn V rocket are an object of their time. We could replicate them, but
there's no point. We have better means to achieve the same end, if the political and monetary will is there.
11 | 1
This myth is a clear sign of a lack of hands-on training at school. Kids really need the opportunity to experience what it’s like to build something. The lack of respect towards the tools, skills and complexity involved in building complex things is a huge problem.
19 | 1
As heard from one of the builders of the F1, "each one started with the same plans, but each one was bespoke, and not every change got noted"
The plans are 'lost' only in the sense of we dont have the notes of so much of the changes made to make those what they ended up being. So many little things we changed on every ship, no two were the same. So technically, there are no plans, original concept on paper yeah, but we dont have the exact plans of "thats how it sat on the pad".
7 | 2
I worked for Rocketdyne in the 60’s there was no CNC machining yet, now you have incredible 3D printing.
2 | 1
Had a minor role in Firefly's Blue Ghost lunar lander that recently achieved the first successful commercial lunar landing in history. It is both simpler and so much better/cheaper than the Apollo LEM. With funding, we could fairly quickly put people on the moon.
4 | 0
The other half of the "why can't we just do it today" is why would we? Why would you want to build a 1968 mustang for the purpose of using it as a sports car? It would get it's trash kicked by other sports cars. The Saturn V, by today's standards is dinosaur aged technology, and would be horrifically expensive or get the same payloads into orbit and to the moon.
1 | 0
I use Apollo documents with test data and empirical formulas to this day, it's amazing how useful they still are.
8 | 2
Petty obvious. It'd be like building a B-29 now when we have stealth bombers.
47 | 3
Bro welding is hard, but having to make a weld strong enough to hold the force of the F-1… mad respect
4 | 4
Please don't force subtitles on us. Put them in the CC (Closed captions) area so we can turn them on or off as we choose.
Thank you in anticipation of your cooperation.
10 | 0
More reason to keep the old trades alive seeing as the knowledge is being lost. As the older generation dies the skills and knowledge goes with them if we don’t keep the skill and trade alive.
4 | 2
In other words they cant be bothered finding talented trades people to do the jobs
And every thing has to be cutting edge technology even if it worse than the technology they had back in the 1970s
1 | 0
Also a lots of the engineers nits were binned and yes the plans still exist for example, the engines each engine was slightly different
| 0
Saturn V was insanely expensive. With current bloat it would cost $10B a flight.
1 | 0
@Toefoo100
1 week ago
Many of the plans aren't complete in the manner that doing all that tasks by hand required all the machinists to have their own special procedures that made the engines work by trial and error.
Another great example of this was the Chrysler turbine car.
78 | 4